[slime-devel] Re: Slime/SBCL/FreeBSD oddities

[Luke Gorrie]

Raymond Wiker <Raymond.Wiker at fast.no> writes:

>         I don't think this is the problem; looking at the definition
> for socket-receive in sb-bsd-sockets/sockets.lisp, I see that EAGAIN
> is not handled there. There is a comment in sqank-sbcl.lisp that
> indicates that EAGAIN should be detected and handled there.

What happens if you #+nil out this form in swank-sbcl.lisp?

    (setf (sb-bsd-sockets:non-blocking-mode socket) t)