[rucksack-devel] Some other things

[Arthur Lemmens]

Levente Mészáros wrote:

> These are nice goals I think but I still think being able to serialize
> structures is almost a must. There are libraries out there using
> structures and one does not want to rewrite those to use classes so
> that data can be serialized. So one either does not use rucksack or
> patches it. To mention one such library there is local-time which uses
> a structure to store the date/time and I guess it will not change in
> the near future so comparing the structure definitions is not that
> important in this case.
>
> I think If structures cannot fullfill the above goals it's still
> better to document it and let the user decide what to do than not
> having structures at all.

Yes, I think you're right.  Thanks, I've committed your patch.

Arthur