[rucksack-devel] PATCH: without-rucksack-gcing

[Arthur Lemmens]

Cyrus Harmon wrote:

> Yes, that sounds like a reasonable approach. I thought about making
> this an argument to with-transaction like:
>
> (with-transaction (:gc nil)
>   ...)

Yes, I'll probably do something like that.

> One thing to note is that eventually you do have to pay the GC cost,
> and on the first transaction with GC after my big insert, there was a
> multiple minute delay while it GCed the rucksack.

Just curious: how big is the resulting rucksack, approximately?

Arthur