[pro] Meaning of "inline" when applied to a generic function?
jean.claude.beaudoin at gmail.com
Wed Jul 9 22:00:44 UTC 2014
Hello CL pros,
I am trying to figure out the meaning of the inline declaration when the so
qualified function happens to be a generic function. As in:
(declaim (inline foo))
(defgeneric foo (a b))
What can be expected of a compiler when it then faces a call to foo while
the above is in effect?
Is this an obvious no-op or did some find something useful to do in such a
Thanks for your help,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the pro