[pro] #; comments...

[Alessio Stalla]

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is the point to evolve the Common Lisp standard into some kind of CLtL4,

Huh? Did I miss a CLtL3...?

On topic: the proposed syntactic addition is nice, but imho too
trivial and too easily provided as a library to bother with a CDR
(that would need to be included in each implementation).

Alessio

-- 
Some gratuitous spam:

http://ripple-project.org Ripple, social credit system
http://villages.cc Villages.cc, Ripple-powered community economy
http://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear ABCL, Common Lisp on the JVM
http://code.google.com/p/tapulli my current open source projects
http://www.manydesigns.com/ ManyDesigns Portofino, open source
model-driven Java web application framework