[pro] macros expanding to defclass + some mop code

[Daniel Weinreb]

On 12/30/10 2:12 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> The solution I proposed last avoids that by having exactly one class 
> definition. However, such cases are unlikely to occur in practice, so 
> this is likely just an academic exercise. Nevertheless, I think it's 
> important to mention this
I agree that mentioning this is a good idea.  Part of the whole idea
of the "pro" mailing list is to be a place where we can all share
knowledge about the more complex/subtle issues in Common
Lisp.  Thanks for clearing this up!

-- Dan