[mcclim-devel] One char patch to presentation-defs [really future of McCLIM]

[kr]

Robert Strandh writes:
 > It is a totally different project in my opinion.  To improve the
 > current code, the owner needs to know both the spec and the code.  To
 > improve the spec, only a limited amount of knowledge of the code is
 > required. 

could you please say more about which particular aspects of mcclim
need to be improved in what ways ?

what is the list of the current 5 top problems that would benefit from
large architectural changes ?

(i've only started listening in on this mailing list recently...)

-- 
regards
markus krummenacker