[ltk-user] Celtk\ltk-kt

[Thomas F. Burdick]

On 3/23/06, Ken Tilton <kentilton at gmail.com> wrote:
> I forgot to mention that Celtk should Just Work with the official ltk, and I
> would build against that, but ltk classic kinda mangles error messages from
> Tk, and I tend to get a lot of those, so there are just a few tweaks (one?)
> to get the whole message legibly. Maybe those (it?) would be a good
> enhancement to Ltk?

Yeah it would be.  We tried to merge your seperation of standard-error
and standard-out, but it didn't work for us.  Since you mentioned it
not working for you either, I'm guessing it bit-rotted somehow.  But
the functioning separation you have now would definately be a good
thing.  If Peter doesn't get to it first, I'll look at that week after
next, when I'm back in town from a business trip.