Patch for iterate.asd

[Robert P. Goldman]

Thanks!  Sorry about the confusion.  Somehow I messed up my interaction
with darcs.  I have caught up now.

Best,
r


On 4/20/17 Apr 20 -8:26 PM, Attila Lendvai wrote:
> thanks for the patch Robert!
> 
> i'm afraid you didn't have the latest version when you made your changes.
> 
>> I'm afraid darcs is one revision control system too many for my poor
>> brain (any chance of changing the iterate repo to git?), so I am
>> attaching a patch file that can be applied to iterate.asd.
> 
> it's as simple as:
> 
> darcs get http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/darcs/iterate
> 
> or just a darcs pull if you already have it. i'm not planning to
> invest time into migrating the repo, but then i'm just one of the guys
> with the commit bit.
> 
> the format of your patch looks rather strange. what did you use to
> produce it? the patch exe on my linux didn't understand it.
> 
> could you please take a look at the latest iterate.asd and see if
> anything needs to be done to it?
> 
> i'll include it here for your convenience:
> 
> ;;; -*- lisp -*- system definition
> 
> (defsystem :iterate
>   :description "Jonathan Amsterdam's iterator/gatherer/accumulator facility"
>   :licence "MIT"
>   :in-order-to ((test-op (test-op :iterate/tests)))
>   :components ((:file "package")
>                (:file "iterate" :depends-on ("package"))))
> 
> (defsystem :iterate/tests
>   :depends-on (:iterate #+sbcl :sb-rt #-sbcl :rt)
>   :components ((:file "iterate-test")))
> 
> (defmethod perform ((operation test-op) (component (eql (find-system
> :iterate/tests))))
>   (funcall (intern "DO-TESTS" (find-package #+sbcl "SB-RT"
>                                             #-sbcl "REGRESSION-TEST"))))
> 
>