[imp-hackers] LOOP non-compliance

[Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll]

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Nikodemus Siivola <
nikodemus at random-state.net> wrote:

> Condition signaled is SB-EXT:DEFCONSTANT-UNEQL, with accessors
> SB-EXT:DEFCONSTANT-UNEQL-NAME, -OLD-VALUE and -NEW-VALUE.
>
[...]
>
 I'll give you a fair warning, though: this is probably the most hated
> feature of SBCL...
>

Wouldn't it make sense to make it a warning, just like the LOOP problem
that started this thread?

Juanjo

-- 
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/implementation-hackers/attachments/20120409/1d57c423/attachment.html>