[imp-hackers] LOOP non-compliance

[Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll]

On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Stas Boukarev <stassats at gmail.com> wrote:

> Then let all implementations to agree on a change.
>

Ok, let's do it, here, right now.

Now, seriously, do you expect to develop _in a mailing list_, the next LOOP
implementation? Perfectly compatible with the standard, the new semantics
is not disruptive, and with the same detail of specification?

No time for that right now, thanks.

Juanjo

-- 
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/implementation-hackers/attachments/20120408/6b715d38/attachment.html>