[imp-hackers] LOOP non-compliance

[Stas Boukarev]

Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com> writes:

> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Stas Boukarev <stassats at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I wish the opposite was true (standard or not), that all implementations
>> accepted (loop while ... for ..), it's such a pain to write LOOPs without
>> this
>> construct.
>>
>
> Having WHILE out of order is not just a syntactic matter, but it implies a
> change of the semantic in LOOP. Such a change cannot be left to the taste
> of a single implementation.
Then let all implementations to agree on a change.

-- 
With best regards, Stas.