[Gsll-devel] DEFCVAR error

[Liam Healy]

Tamas,

Glad it's working out for you.

init.lisp doesn't have a in-package because the package is made in that file.
I've seen people put an in-package after the defpackage, but the default package
is irrelevant in that file, so I just left it out.

I'm still working on the ffa adaptation, I hope I'll have something usable soon.

Liam


On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Tamas K Papp <tpapp at princeton.edu> wrote:
> Dear Liam and Jason,
>
>  Thanks for your help.  I had all the files below, so I tried manually
>  loading the foreign libraries, and it worked.  So I thought what the
>  heck, and deleted the fasl files for gsll from my clc cache, and now
>  it works perfectly.
>
>  Just a question: isn't init.lisp supposed to have an (in-package :gsl)
>  statement somewhere?  Or do you want stuff there happening outside
>  gsl:?
>
>  Anyhow, now GSL seems to work, I tried erf and was overwhelmed with
>  happiness.  Having all these useful functions is a big deal for my
>  work.
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  Tamas
>
>
>
>  On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 01:39:00PM -0400, Liam Healy wrote:
>  > Here's what I have under /usr/lib,
>  >
>  > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3917574 2008-01-28 07:58 /usr/lib/libgsl.a
>  > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  420802 2008-01-28 07:58 /usr/lib/libgslcblas.a
>  > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      20 2008-02-04 09:06
>  > /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so -> libgslcblas.so.0.0.0
>  > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      20 2008-02-04 09:06
>  > /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0 -> libgslcblas.so.0.0.0
>  > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  199096 2008-01-28 07:58 /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0.0.0
>  > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      16 2008-02-04 09:06 /usr/lib/libgsl.so ->
>  > libgsl.so.0.10.0
>  > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      16 2008-02-04 09:06 /usr/lib/libgsl.so.0
>  > -> libgsl.so.0.10.0
>  > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1966928 2008-01-28 07:58 /usr/lib/libgsl.so.0.10.0
>  >
>  > and packages installed (Debian unstable)
>  > ii  gsl-bin                        1.10-4                         GNU
>  > Scientific Library (GSL) -- binary package
>  > ii  gsl-ref-html                   1.10-1                         GNU
>  > Scientific Library (GSL) Reference Manual in html
>  > ii  libgsl0                        1.9-3                          GNU
>  > Scientific Library (GSL) -- library package
>  > ii  libgsl0-dev                    1.10-4                         GNU
>  > Scientific Library (GSL) -- development package
>  > ii  libgsl0ldbl                    1.10-4                         GNU
>  > Scientific Library (GSL) -- library package
>  >
>  > not all of which are necessary of course.  I have found in general
>  > with Debian libraries that they often fail to link to the most general
>  > "so" file, so that e.g. there will be a libxyz.so.0.n and a
>  > libxyz.so.0 that's a link to that, but then I will need to make a link
>  > libxyz.so.  I can't remember if that happened with GSL or not, but
>  > check for that if it says the library is missing but you think you've
>  > installed it.
>  >
>  > Liam
>  >