[fomus-devel] MusicXML Importing (more or less)
David Psenicka
dpsenick at uiuc.edu
Sun Feb 5 04:35:50 UTC 2006
I have big problems importing rhythms into Sibelius when they involve
any kind of tuplet, even triplets (by now I'm sure that this isn't a
problem in the XML file but in Sibelius's importing)--the other obvious
problem with Sibelius is that the parts don't get grouped correctly,
(though this isn't as serious, I put in a way of getting around
this--I'm putting in a growing list of "kludge" variables to get around
these problems).
I'll put a list of these in the documentation as I find them--I wouldn't
trust Sibelius at all at the moment. So far it seems that Finale (with
Dolet) imports all of the basic things without mangling them...
Kilian Sprotte wrote:
>
> Am 03.02.2006 um 09:16 schrieb David Psenicka:
>
>> Finished the MusicXML output and it should also run in Windows now.
>>
>> Unfortunately, there are some issues importing tremolos, harmonics
>> and a few other things into Siblius and Finale...
>
>
> Cool, that sounds very good, I haven't really tried out the MusicXML
> using fomus, yet. But from other experiences I made, I believe that
> neither the import into Finale nor Sibelius (seems to be worse) works
> without issues that one would categorize as being solely cosmetic. : (
> 5-Tuplets seem to be too hard for Sibelius and with Finale I don't
> remember what (nested tuplets?), but there has been something else as
> well concerning the rhythmical structure (I only used the demo
> version, so maybe...).
>
> If one concentrates only on the rhythmical framework, time
> signatures, durations, tuplets, beaming and pitches, are your
> experiences with Finale or Sibelius pretty okay?
> _______________________________________________
> fomus-devel mailing list
> fomus-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fomus-devel
>
More information about the Fomus-devel
mailing list