[fetter-devel] Re: [cffi-devel] Re: The results of your email commands

[nicolas lamirault]

thanks for your answer.
i try Verrazano (from darcs repository), but i've got a problem with it too
i make a past to resume this : http://paste.lisp.org/display/49805

2007/10/25, Attila Lendvai <attila.lendvai at gmail.com>:
> > So the Verrazano project has been resurrected? Does it handle methods that
>
>
> recently i needed a few bindings and worked on it for a while. the
> core deserves a rewrite to use a non-sxml parser, preferably a parser
> that emits clos objects and use method dispatch to emit stuff. i'd
> even use contextl for hyper-customizability.
>
> it's long towards the end of my todo list... i'd grab a better xml
> parser (most probably cxml, also see
> http://lichteblau.blogspot.com/2007/08/new-data-structure-for-xml.html
> ) and rewrite the internals of verrazano. it's not a big work, but
> needs time and better understanding of c/c++ then i have offhand.
>
> i'll write up a TODO in the repo.
>
> but in spite of that, take a look at these example bindings,
> especially the oracle one and the opengl one:
>
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/darcsweb/darcsweb.cgi?r=fetter-verrazano;a=tree;f=/bindings
>
>
> > are both overloaded and overridden? Is it possible to subclass a C++ class
>
>
> as i've seen there was some minimal work on overloaded methods, but
> it's bitrotted since then. as i understand it, a proper ABI
> abstraction layer is completely missing from verrazano-runtime.
>
>
> > in Lisp via Verrazano? I started to develop support for both these features in
> > Swig; maybe I should switch to Verrazano.
>
>
> i really think you should. verrazano is superior in two aspects: 1)
> it's based on
> gcc-xml, and 2) it's written in lisp... :)
>
>
> sorry for the cross-post,
>
> --
>  attila
> _______________________________________________
> cffi-devel mailing list
> cffi-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
>