[fetter-devel] unnamed bit fields
Luis Oliveira
luismbo at gmail.com
Tue Sep 13 05:23:49 UTC 2005
On 13/set/2005, at 06:06, Kenny Tilton wrote:
> Didn't this start with a problem report from your first customer? Or
> were they just making an observation? If the former, that gives you a
> measure of how serious the problem is -- it came up in normal usage,
> not some arcane stress test. So that makes it higher priority. Also,
> it is one of your first customers, and you only get once chance to
> make a first impression.
Indeed, you have a point there.
However, I don't see any much support for bitfields in other FFI's
(only Allegro supports that AFAICT from a quick skim through the
various docs). I suspect the details of bitfields vary a lot between
compilers/abis.
This particular customer didn't actually need bitfields, though.
Verrazano was generating unnecessary/unused struct typedefs, right?
--
Luís Oliveira
http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/
Equipa Portuguesa do Translation Project
http://www2.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard/po/registry.cgi?team=pt
More information about the fetter-devel
mailing list