[elephant-devel] Ditching Darcs

[Robert L. Read]

I tend to agree with Alex.  I don't think we need to optimize our use of
source control.  I know nothing about Mercurial, having used only CVS,
subversion, and Darcs but I think getting 1.0 done should be our focus.


On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 21:58 +0300, Alex Mizrahi wrote:
>       LPP>  At least one revision from stable produces a non-trivial
>       merge in unstable.
> 
> 
> what does this mean?
> 
>       LPP>  If no one objects I'd do it with Mercurial and then upload
>       the resulting repository to Bitbucket.
> 
> 
> why do you think mercurial would be free of problems? why not git?
> what if next year some new uber-cool DVCS will appear -- will we have to
> move to it?
> 
> using bitbucket has its advantages, but IMHO not big enough to ditch current
> darcs repos. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> elephant-devel site list
> elephant-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel