[elephant-devel] Clbuild

[Bryan Emrys]

I'm not a master of anything, but pragmas seem to be the approach used in hunchentoot (see below). 

(asdf:defsystem :hunchentoot
  :serial t
  :version #.*hunchentoot-version*
  :depends-on (:chunga
               :cl-base64
               :cl-fad
               :cl-ppcre
               #-(or :lispworks :hunchentoot-no-ssl) :cl+ssl
               :md5
               :rfc2388
               #+:sbcl :sb-bsd-sockets
               #+:sbcl :sb-posix
               :url-rewrite)
  :components ((:file "packages")
               (:file "conditions")
               #+:allegro (:file "port-acl")
               #+:clisp (:file "port-clisp")
               #+:cmu (:file "port-cmu")
               #+:lispworks (:file "port-lw")
               #+:openmcl (:file "port-mcl")
               #+:sbcl (:file "port-sbcl")
               (:file "specials")
               (:file "mime-types")
               (:file "util")
               (:file "log")
               (:file "cookie")
               (:file "reply")
               (:file "request")
               (:file "session")
               (:file "misc")
               (:file "easy-handlers")
               (:file "headers")
               #+(and :allegro :unix) (:file "unix-acl")
               #+(and :clisp :unix) (:file "unix-clisp")
               #+(and :cmu :unix) (:file "unix-cmu")
               #+(and :lispworks :unix) (:file "unix-lw")
               #+(and :openmcl :unix) (:file "unix-mcl")
               #+(and :sbcl :unix (not :win32)) (:file "unix-sbcl")
               (:file "server")))


Bryan

On Sunday 11 May 2008 05:12:16 pm Robert L. Read wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 14:22 -0700, Bryan Emrys wrote:
> > At one point the clbuild maintainers looked at elephant but had some problems that prevented inclusion.
> > 
> > Specifically:
> > 
> > #  - needs sb-posix, but doesn't declare that dependency, meaning that
> > #    it doesn't build even with a config file
> > #  - ele-clsql loads clsql from the .asd file, not using :depends-on,
> > #    which is completely unacceptable
> > #    (we blacklist ele-clsql in clbuild.lisp because of that)
> > 
> > Did anyone ever respond?
> 
> Dear Bryan,
> 	Thanks for calling this to our attention.  I doubt anyone ever
> responded to our being blacklisted, as I have no recollection of it.
> 
> 	I have removed the explicit load, and my tests are red but I doubt that
> was the problem.
> 
> 	I am not a master of ASDF --- can someone (Bryan?) tell me how we can
> integrate the fact that we depend on sb-posix into the ASDF
> (:depeonds-on ) expressions without dependence on SBCL?  Can we just use
> a compiler pragma like:
> 
>   :depends-on (:uffi 
> #+sbcl  :sb-posix
> :cl-base64))
> 
> 
> 
> in our asdf files?  If so we will have to do something similar for 
> each supported system (see os.lisp):
> 
> 
> (defmacro in-directory ((dir) &body body)
>   `(progn 
>      (#+sbcl sb-posix:chdir 
>       #+cmu unix:unix-chdir
>       #+allegro excl:chdir
>       #+lispworks hcl:change-directory
>       #+openmcl ccl:cwd
>       ,dir)
>      , at body))
> 
> Finally, our documentation build system, make-ref.lisp, seems to be more
> deeply SBCL dependent than anything in Elephant;  but that doesn't hurt
> much, as we normally build and publish the documentation with each
> release anyway.  I wonder if we could just make the documentation build
> a separate package, in order to satisfy the clbuild requirements?
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > elephant-devel site list
> > elephant-devel at common-lisp.net
> > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> elephant-devel site list
> elephant-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
>