[Ecls-list] Resitricted mode - possible?

Matthew Mondor mm_lists at pulsar-zone.net
Wed Nov 14 20:12:26 UTC 2012


On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:27:13 +0100
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciaripoll at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:42 AM, Matthew Mondor <mm_lists at pulsar-zone.net>wrote:
> 
> > I forgot to write about another alternative using bytecode though... if
> > all code compiles to bytecode only, and the bytecode interpreter
> > permits to impose all the limits you need
> >
> 
> The problem is not the bytecodes, but the libraries. Common Lisp contains
> lots of functions that allocate memory. Of course, one could do a very
> invasive auditing of ECL and log all those operations, but this is a
> nontrivial change -- I doubt this approach is used elsewhere: doesn't
> Google Chrome actually devote one process for each page, thus isolating
> them perfectly?

At least according to a paper I read about it when it came out, it does
use one process per tab.
-- 
Matt




More information about the ecl-devel mailing list