[Ecls-list] Problem with pathnames

[Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll]

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon <
pjb at informatimago.com> wrote:

>
> ECL could define that :unspecific doesn't make sense for types, and
> could define that it is mapped to NIL.  ie.  pathname-type could never
> return :unspecific (and similarly for other components).


That would be consistent with the fact that no file system routines accepts
:unspecific.

-- 
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/ecl-devel/attachments/20110115/dd09c57a/attachment.html>