[Ecls-list] declaim question

[Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll]

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Matthew Mondor <mm_lists at pulsar-zone.net>wrote:

> I also so far was confused by that message; I'm not sure of its
> usefulness if it really shows the state before the file is compiled,
> though.  This is good to know; I used to include a declaim in my build
> scripts because I also thought the toplevel one of the file wasn't
> taken into consideration and somehow I never noticed yet that they
> really were.
>

Would you guys remove the log statement at all, would you change it or would
you make ECL even more verbose about the different proclamations /
declamations, etc?

Juanjo

-- 
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/ecl-devel/attachments/20110214/ec167b27/attachment.html>