[Ecls-list] make-build vs. xlib

[Julian Stecklina]

Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <
> juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Julian Stecklina <js at alien8.de> wrote:
>>
>>> If I load the system on the REPL, everything works as expected and the
>>> PRINT prints #<"XLIB" package>. If I compile foo to a standalone binary
>>> using (asdf:make-build 'foo :type :program), I get NIL, i.e. the XLIB
>>> module is missing from the binary.
>>>
>>
>> This has nothing to do with XLIB per se. The problem is simply that
>> precompiled modules (xlib, asdf, etc) can not be included in standalone
>> binaries. That requires a bit more hacking of ASDF than is currently done,
>> as well as changing the build process to install statically linked versions
>> of those modules.
>>
>
> This limitation has been lifted in git/CVS, though I did not make a full
> test with CLX.

Thanks!

Regards,
-- 
Julian Stecklina

The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day
they start making vacuum cleaners - Ernst Jan Plugge