[Ecls-list] Type propagator and "bogus" existing code

Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com
Mon Jun 21 22:15:24 UTC 2010

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Samium Gromoff <_deepfire at feelingofgreen.ru
> wrote:

> On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:44:35 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <
> juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Anyway, I think I will settle for a simple style warning. The
> disadvantage
> > is that this will mask real problems, such as real type errors, but given
> > Common Lisp's semantics and the code out there, nothing else seems
> sensible.
> I'd like to see optional (yet disabled by default) error signalling.
> How hard would that be to add?

Not too much, but I keep it in the waiting list until the other problems are


Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/ecl-devel/attachments/20100622/dcea5dfa/attachment.html>

More information about the ecl-devel mailing list