[Ecls-list] Type propagator and "bogus" existing code
_deepfire at feelingofgreen.ru
Mon Jun 21 17:38:05 UTC 2010
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:44:35 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Anyway, I think I will settle for a simple style warning. The disadvantage
> is that this will mask real problems, such as real type errors, but given
> Common Lisp's semantics and the code out there, nothing else seems sensible.
I'd like to see optional (yet disabled by default) error signalling.
How hard would that be to add?
"Actually I made up the term 'object-oriented', and I can tell you I
did not have C++ in mind." - Alan Kay (OOPSLA 1997 Keynote)
More information about the ecl-devel