[Ecls-list] Type propagator and "bogus" existing code

[Samium Gromoff]

On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:44:35 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Anyway, I think I will settle for a simple style warning. The disadvantage
> is that this will mask real problems, such as real type errors, but given
> Common Lisp's semantics and the code out there, nothing else seems sensible.

I'd like to see optional (yet disabled by default) error signalling.

How hard would that be to add?

-- 
regards,
  Samium Gromoff
--
"Actually I made up the term 'object-oriented', and I can tell you I
did not have C++ in mind." - Alan Kay (OOPSLA 1997 Keynote)