[Ecls-list] Regular toplevel functions vs. labels

Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com
Sun Jul 4 20:44:10 UTC 2010


On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Matthew Mondor <mm_lists at pulsar-zone.net>wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:25:18 -0500
> Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
>
> >   Is the ECL compilation scheme of functions defined by
> > labels likely to yield better codes than those functions
> > defined at toplevel?
> [...]
>
As for global vs local functions, they currently seem to be treated the
> same in this particular case.
> [...]
>

At some point we could add unboxing of local function arguments. That would
definitely separate local functions from global ones, but right now I would
not expect great differences.

Juanjo

-- 
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/ecl-devel/attachments/20100704/d590436e/attachment.html>


More information about the ecl-devel mailing list