[Ecls-list] Can we add "long long" support to ECL on Linux/x86?

[Waldek Hebisch]

Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> > Would it be possible to merge this patch with the current ECL main code
> > base?
> 
> I must say that there is a larger fix being worked on, which involves
> support for [u]int{8,16, 32, 64}_t, and [unsigned] long long, first at
> the level of lisp arrays and then in the compiler and in the FFI.
> 

Good news.

-- 
                              Waldek Hebisch
hebisch at math.uni.wroc.pl