[Ecls-list] Can we add "long long" support to ECL on Linux/x86?

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:22 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
<juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Would it be possible to merge this patch with the current ECL main code
>> base?
>
> I must say that there is a larger fix being worked on, which involves
> support for [u]int{8,16, 32, 64}_t, and [unsigned] long long, first at
> the level of lisp arrays and then in the compiler and in the FFI.

I'd think this is the most reasonable solution, over the traditional
C type names.

-- Gaby