[Ecls-list] Slow prettyprinting (update)
Waldek Hebisch
hebisch at math.uni.wroc.pl
Sat Feb 16 00:36:30 UTC 2008
I wrote:
> Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> > I am not sure how much this improves build times in FriCAS.
> >
>
> ATM I did not check new_apply branch. Most data I have measures
> different improvements, but here is comparison for simplified
> build. Simplified build saves a lot of time consuming using
> pregenerated files (this is essentially the time users of
> "full" release will see). Using released ecl-0.9j-p1 real
> time on 1.86 GHz Intel Core 2 is 22m59.790. Using CVS 2008-02-04 23:57
> real time is 18m37.244.
>
I have now data for bootstrap build. Compared to full build this
skips generating documentaton (which is also time consuming), but
contains all steps which use prettyprinter:
openmcl 44 min
sbcl 45 min
gcl 54 min
clisp 64 min
ecl-cvs 190 min
ecl-0.9j-p1 306 min
ecl-cvs is CVS 2008-02-04 23:57. I must admit that difference between
release and cvs version is bigger than I would expect.
Note: this times correspond to current SVN FriCAS, earlier versions
have much longer build times.
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebisch at math.uni.wroc.pl
More information about the ecl-devel
mailing list