[Ecls-list] read-char eof issue?

[Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll]

On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Raymond Toy <toy.raymond at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't understand the recursive-p arg very well, and I think in this
> example it should probably not be T.
> However, both cmucl and clisp don't complain for this example.

Yes, I see. I have checked the code and this is a very old behavior
which is extended to all functions with a recursive-p argument. I will
have to check the implications of removing it very carefully.

Juanjo

-- 
Instituto de Física Fundamental
CSIC, Serrano, 113, Madrid 28040 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com