[Ecls-list] experimental patch for review (unboxed functions and some misc socket fixes)

[Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll]

Hi Brian,

thanks for the patch. I will review in the coming days, though I
cannot promise how long it will take until I incorporate the patches.

2007/8/18, Brian Spilsbury <brian.spilsbury at gmail.com>:
> Hello,
> I think that it would probably be better to have the boxed version as
> the primary function, and to use a property to refer direct calls to a
> different function. This would also allow the unboxed interface to
> have a specific C name.

Yes, that is more reasonable.

> When using sockets, I found that short reads weren't being handled
> properly -- also the built-in socket server code was leaking
> descriptors.

Can you be more specific about this? Is this related to the sb-sockets code?

Juanjo

-- 
Facultad de Fisicas, Universidad Complutense,
Ciudad Universitaria s/n Madrid 28040 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com