[Ecls-list] Re: One more Makefile.in patch

[Maciek Pasternacki]

On Prickle-Prickle, Discord 41, 3171 YOLD, John Connors wrote:

> I got latest ECLS, and configured using mingw. To my surprise when I 
> typed make all after the configure, make complained that there was no 
> way to build ecls as there was no target matching it when it was invoked 
> by all. It seems the target is defined as ecls$(EXE) now, and the all: 
> line needs to be updated to reflect this fact. I'm not familiar enough 
> with autotools to know what to touch..

Attached patch should fix it.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: configure.in-exeext.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3199 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/ecl-devel/attachments/20050425/79afae06/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------

-- 
__    Maciek Pasternacki <maciekp at japhy.fnord.org> [ http://japhy.fnord.org/ ]
`| _   |_\  / { (3)  With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.  However,
,|{-}|}| }\/                       this is not necessarily a good idea.[...] }
\/   |____/                     ( RFC 1925, Basic Truths of Networking )  -><-