[cltl3-devel] requirements on CL libraries

[Stelian Ionescu]

On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 19:14 +0200, Marco Antoniotti wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I don't want to sound negative...  but this effort *must* be really 
> taken lightly and ecumenically.

I agree.


> If you can access the CLRFI/CLURFI 
> logs, you will see that it is very easy to get into very heated fights.  
> I know as I was one of the major offenders.

The original CRLFI archives were lost when the ALU site crashed, but are
still available through archive.org


> Yet I think I had some decent ideas about how to go ahead and "organize" 
> extensions and categorize them.  I will dig the proposal out as soon as 
> I get to my other computer.

Excellent :)

-- 
Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cltl3-devel/attachments/20090515/5ef8d4c8/attachment.sig>