Time to consolidate static project pages into GitLab?

[Raymond Toy]

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:09 AM, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> One question does remain: would anybody be interested in having the "easy"
> route for deploying static website content through Git*Lab* pages? In other
> words, would there still be a benefit for us setting it up or is there no
> demand?
>
>
​Is it a lot of work or on-going maintenance? Do the static pages also get
a git repo so you can do revision control on them?

I'm considering moving the pages from www.cmucl.org to here (and having
www.cmucl.org redirect).  But we're also considering just moving all the
pages there to the wiki, so we then wouldn't need static pages.  There
aren't a lot of pages and the pages are quite simple so the effort to move
to the wiki isn't huge.​




> Regards,
>
>
> Erik.
>
>
>
>>  06.05.2017, 13:15, "Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi Daniel, Anton,
>>
>> Thanks for your reactions. That's enough to decide not to change our ways.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Erik.
>>
>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Daniel Kochmański <daniel at turtleware.eu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Same goes for me, I host various static files on both ECL and McCLIM
>> projects (documentation, papers, in case of ECL - releases).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Daniel
>>
>> Anton Vodonosov writes:
>>
>> > In cl-test-grid I store reports as static files on cl.net. Not sure
>> it's possible with gitlab pages.
>> > Best regards,
>> > - Anton
>> > 06.05.2017, 01:30, "Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels at gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >  Hi all,
>> >  Since the inception of Common-Lisp.net, we have offered projects the
>> option to log in on the host through ssh connections to manage their
>> >  hosted project pages (https://common-lisp.net/project/*).
>> >  As off December 2016, GitLab - the software we use to provide the
>> majority of the repositories on the site - includes a hosting offer for
>> >  static pages: https://about.gitlab.com/2016/
>> 12/24/were-bringing-gitlab-pages-to-community-edition/
>> >  I've not studied the functionality in depth, but I'm wondering: would
>> the time have come to start moving the project pages into GitLab by
>> >  using this offering and start moving away from having OS-based
>> accounts?
>> >  Would people mind or even like to move to this functionality?
>> >  Regards,
>> >
>> >  --
>> >  Bye,
>> >  Erik.
>> >  http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
>> >  Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kochmański ;; aka jackdaniel | Przemyśl, Poland
>> TurtleWare - Daniel Kochmański      | www.turtleware.eu
>>
>> "Be the change that you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bye,
>>
>> Erik.
>>
>> http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
>> Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bye,
>
> Erik.
>
> http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
> Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
>



-- 
Ray
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/clo-devel/attachments/20170519/7b866eaa/attachment.html>