Progress on stitching mailing list history back together
evenson at panix.com
Wed Apr 8 17:11:59 UTC 2015
On 2015/4/8 12:13, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> Hi Mark, all,
> No problem. The archives have been offline for so long a week or two
>> doesn't make all that much difference.
>> It would be nice to be able to announce on ELS that they're finally
>> stitched and back though. Hope that's a timeline you can support when you
>> look at it more closely on Thursday.
> Been searching around for documentation regarding
> non-time-sequentially-ordered mailman archives. My reading of
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2007-April/056687.html is
> that we can add the missing posts any time and simply need to regenerated
> the entire archive when we do.
> That being the case, I think I should restore the mailing list archives and
> when we get to it, we can add the missing mails to the armedbear-devel
> list's archive. That would remove the pressure off of you to come up with
> the missing mails asap.
> Would that work for you?
Not sure what you are suggesting other than wait until my full archive
In any case, I finally got enough bandwidth [to upload my IMAP archives
as Thunderbird had them on my local disk].
Slice 'n dice at will; or tell me the format that you need to process.
I assume [mbox] would be the natural choice, probably stripping out
the delivery headers.
"A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before, but there
is nothing to compare to it now."
More information about the clo-devel