Trial stitching of mailing list histories at https://mailman-test.common-lisp.net/pipermail/

[Anton Vodonosov]

Hi Erik, thank you very much for this work.

I noticed small difference in capitalization of mailing list name:

Compare:

https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-plus-ssl-devel/2014-April/000000.html
https://mailman-test.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-plus-ssl-devel/2014-April/000249.html

Your new mailman-test archive does better job whey it says
"More information about the cl-plus-ssl-devel mailing list", while current version says
"More information about the Cl-plus-ssl-devel mailing list" - capitalized list name.

Interesting, that both versions use capitalized list name
in another phrase: "Previous message: [Cl-plus-ssl-devel]..."

If we check some elder messages, for example
https://mailman-test.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-plus-ssl-devel/2014-January/000248.html
the list name is lower case everywhere.


I don't see other problems (although I don't have
good ideas how to verify the archive).

Best regards,
- Anton

06.04.2015, 11:17, "Erik Huelsmann" <ehuels at gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Last night I have finished my scripts which stitch the mailing list history from the old common-lisp.net system's mailman, the mlmmj and the new mailman archives.
>
> The result is hosted here: https://mailman-test.common-lisp.net/pipermail/
>
> I'd greatly appreciate review of the result in order to be able to fix any issues before we do the final conversion run. Comments can be posted here.
>
> If you find spam when going through the archives, please let me know, because since we're re-generating the mailing list archives, now is a good time to remove it.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Bye,
>
> Erik.
>
> http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
> Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.