Trial stitching of mailing list histories at https://mailman-test.common-lisp.net/pipermail/

[Liam Healy]

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Liam,
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Liam Healy <lhealy at common-lisp.net> wrote:
>
>> Latest messages in gsll-devel are missing. There were a few more messages
>> in the thread "Recurring callbacks" after the two shown.
>>
>>
> Thanks for verifying. Unfortunately, it seems that the messages haven't
> been added to the archives:
> https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/gsll-devel/2015-January doesn't
> show them either, which is what I was copying from. I'll look into that.
> Could you provide me with the messages so I can stitch them into the new
> archive with the rest of them? (e.g. by downloading the message "source"
> using a pop3 downloader or something alike? -- Using the text which is
> shown by GMail under the "show original" works well too, if these are only
> a few messages. I prefer to receive them in a zip or tar archive
> attachment, if possible.)
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Erik.
>
>
>> Liam
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 4:16 AM, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Last night I have finished my scripts which stitch the mailing list
>>> history from the old common-lisp.net system's mailman, the mlmmj and
>>> the new mailman archives.
>>>
>>> The result is hosted here:
>>> https://mailman-test.common-lisp.net/pipermail/
>>>
>>> I'd greatly appreciate review of the result in order to be able to fix
>>> any issues before we do the final conversion run. Comments can be posted
>>> here.
>>>
>>> If you find spam when going through the archives, please let me know,
>>> because since we're re-generating the mailing list archives, now is a good
>>> time to remove it.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bye,
>>>
>>> Erik.
>>>
>>> http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
>>> Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bye,
>
> Erik.
>

Well, checking the emails I know why. One party did a "reply" rather than a
"reply all" and the mailing list was dropped in the cc list.

Liam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/clo-devel/attachments/20150406/98e6c019/attachment.html>