[lists] Re: [clo-devel] Getting clhp installed on Apache
Mario Mommer
mommer at igpm.rwth-aachen.de
Fri Nov 14 07:57:01 UTC 2003
Anthony Ventimiglia <anthony at ventimiglia.org> writes:
> Nikodemus Siivola writes:
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:03:36AM -0500, Anthony Ventimiglia wrote:
> >
> > That said, wearing my voting hat:
> >
> > I don't know.
> >
> > How important is it to you? Is this "vital", or "kind of neat"?
> >
> > How much overhead for Erik (on the long run)? If we do this, will it generate
> > good infrastructure that can be utilized in the future, or will it be
> > a wart on the system?
>
> I agree with both your questions and answers.
Me too.... :)
> In my previous post I gave some of the potential problems, which are
> no more of a risk than running CGI scripts. So it's a matter of
> trusting users who write clhp pages, and as I said before, I don't
> see why any of us would have malicious intents regarding the
> common-lisp.net server. If you guys are still uncomfortable with
> that, we can restrict the clhp-handler to only work in selected
> directories.
The problem is not necessarily one of us doing malicious things
intentionally (I guess that goes without saying :-) ) but
unintentionally by screwing up (c.f. Murphy's Law). So yes, it has to
be sandboxed.
> As far as the infrastructure, I think that it would be a benifit to us
> all to have it available on the server. Sure we could use PHP to
> provide the same functionality, but I'd assume that most of us would
> rather use Lisp than PHP.
Yes, that is true.
Regards,
Mario.
More information about the clo-devel
mailing list