[clfswm-devel] CLFSWM licence change? (end)

[madnificent]

dear CLFSWM-devel,


this obviously means that I will not add contributions to CLFSWM.
there's a bunch of code here which will sadly live only locally.  i do
wish you all the best of luck and hope CLFSWM will have a good life,
even after i stop using it in the future.

the only saddening things for me about these discussions has been that
no developers actually joined in with meaningful comments (in fact,
only a user that apparently can't get CLFSWM running showed interest)
and that none of the claimed issues with the GPL have been overturned.

again, i hope CLFSWM has a bright future with many many happy users and devs.


best regards,

the madnificent


On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Philippe Brochard
<pbrochard at common-lisp.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> CLFSWM licence change again. To sum up :
>
>
> 1) Stay with the actual GPLv3 'or any later version'
>
>  -> 2 or 3 votes
>
> 2) Switch to the LLGPL
>
>  -> 1 vote
>
> 3) Switch to a BSD like licence.
>
>  -> 1 vote
>
> I haven't been able to join some important contributors (at least for
> ideas). Second, CLFSWM is based on some Stumpwm ideas but as I already
> said there's not so mush code from this WM nor from the Eclipse WM in
> CLFSWM. But by respect to those projects I'll let CLFSWM under the GPLv3
> (or any later version).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Philippe
>
> _______________________________________________
> clfswm-devel mailing list
> clfswm-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clfswm-devel