[cl-plus-ssl-devel] (and :cl+ssl :clisp :windows)

[Pixel // pinterface]

"David Lichteblau" <david at lichteblau.com> said:
> Quoting Pixel // pinterface (pinterface at gmail.com):
> > This obviates the need for the above changes to CFFI and I /think/
retains
> > correct behavior on other lisp implementations--buf is still around, so
I
> > don't see why it wouldn't--but that's not a theory I can test.
>
> That sounds like the correct solution.
>
> Do you have an account on common-lisp.net so that you can commit those
> patches yourself?

No, no I don't. But I can at least attach a proper patch, if that'll help.

-pixie                                      I don't even have a GPG key.
                                           Not very geeky of me, I know.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cl+ssl-clisp.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1411 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cl-plus-ssl-devel/attachments/20070324/1cd7fedc/attachment.obj>