[cl-plus-ssl-devel] (and :cl+ssl :clisp :windows)

[David Lichteblau]

Quoting Pixel // pinterface (pinterface at gmail.com):
> This obviates the need for the above changes to CFFI and I /think/ retains
> correct behavior on other lisp implementations--buf is still around, so I
> don't see why it wouldn't--but that's not a theory I can test.

That sounds like the correct solution.

Do you have an account on common-lisp.net so that you can commit those
patches yourself?


d.