[cl-opengl-devel] cl-opengl and clx naming conflict

[David Lichteblau]

Quoting Lu?s Oliveira (luismbo at gmail.com):
> That sucks. We need namespaces for packages. I'd argue that CLX could
> more easily use GLX as the package name. Any luck on that side?

If I understood Christophe Rhodes right, he would be prepared to accept
a patch renaming CLX's GL package.  (Not sure about GLX, since there are
already two distinct packages in CLX called GL and GLX.)


d.