[cl-opengl-devel] cl-opengl and clx naming conflict

[Luís Oliveira]

On 20/01/2008, David Lichteblau <david at lichteblau.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately cl-opengl and CLX both define a package called GL, so we
> cannot dump a core file including them.
>
> Is there a chance that cl-opengl might switch to a more specific package
> name?

That sucks. We need namespaces for packages. I'd argue that CLX could
more easily use GLX as the package name. Any luck on that side?

-- 
Luís Oliveira
http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/