[cl-debian] Bug#328633: marked as done (common-lisp-controller: Security upload for CAN-2005-2657?)

Thu Sep 22 10:33:22 UTC 2005

Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:30:02 +0200
with message-id <20050922103002.GA8938 at kitenet.net>
and subject line er, ok
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Sep 2005 14:04:24 +0000
>From micah at riseup.net Fri Sep 16 07:04:21 2005
Return-path: <micah at riseup.net>
Received: from mail.riseup.net [69.90.134.155] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EGGpB-0003tO-00; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:21 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574C6A31F7;
	Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.riseup.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (buffy [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
	id 31018-38; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B290BA31EF;
	Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pond (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id D6D343A81F; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:36:41 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Micah Anderson <micah at riseup.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit at bugs.debian.org>
Subject: common-lisp-controller: Security upload for CAN-2005-2657?
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:36:41 -0400
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team <team at security.debian.org>
Message-Id: <20050916043641.D6D343A81F at pond>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at riseup.net
Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
	HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: common-lisp-controller
Version: 4.16
Severity: normal
Tags: security

Hi,

I notice that in DSA-811-1[1] that common-lisp-controller has a fix
for CAN-2005-2657 uploaded into stable, and the upload that is
recorded as fixing this issue in unstable is for version 4.18[2].
However, there has not been an upload to unstable since 4.16 on
8/3/05. Do you anticipate uploading a fix to unstable soon? Or is the
fixed version actually 4.16 and the DSA is incorrect?

Thanks,
Micah

1. http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-811
2. "For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in
version 4.18."

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328633-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 10:30:07 +0000
>From joey at kitenet.net Thu Sep 22 03:30:07 2005
Return-path: <joey at kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EIOL9-0007Nn-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 03:30:07 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dhcp-sn38-07.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de [134.106.38.27])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A612D18596
	for <328633-done at bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:30:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 66D2EBEEF3; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:30:02 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:30:02 +0200
From: Joey Hess <joeyh at debian.org>
To: 328633-done at bugs.debian.org
Subject: er, ok
Message-ID: <20050922103002.GA8938 at kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: 328633-done at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Version: 4.18

Maintain appeared to ignore my request, oh well.

--=20
see shy jo

--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDMoeqd8HHehbQuO8RAmt0AKCpwPg5Bm+1i8xl7W5A0N4wFZMGHQCglQhj
vNHSRwL8MWoBDofwt8AAQgo=
=tVpT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--