[cl-debian] Bug#335489: slime: doesn't start on SBCL without cl-swank (it should depend on the latest)

[Peter Van Eynde]

On Monday 24 October 2005 10:59, Luca Capello wrote:
> The severity is important, because you could want SLIME to connect to
> a remote swank and in this case you don't need a local cl-swank.
>
> At the same time, however, I think that depending on cl-swank by
> default is the best thing to do (cl-swank it's just 1.2MB), especially
> for newbies.

In the end I think you're right, the added problem are not worth the reduction 
in complexity on the slime side.

Groetjes, Peter

-- 
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org 
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
"God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson|