Bug#335489: [cl-debian] Bug#335489: slime: doesn't start on SBCL without cl-swank (it should depend on the latest)

[Faré]

Why not have:
* cl-slime, that depends on cl-slime-el and cl-swank
* cl-slime-el, that contains the emacs lisp code and doesn't depend on cl-swank
* cl-swank, that contains the common-lisp code and doesn't depend on cl-slime-el
* sch-swank, that contains the scheme code...
whatever.

Do the Right Thing(tm).

On 24/10/05, Luca Capello <luca at pca.it> wrote:
> The severity is important, because you could want SLIME to connect to
> a remote swank and in this case you don't need a local cl-swank.
>
> At the same time, however, I think that depending on cl-swank by
> default is the best thing to do (cl-swank it's just 1.2MB), especially
> for newbies.
>
> Attached a patch versus the darcs repository [1].

[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.