Pre-submission discussion: code walking

[Marco Antoniotti]

> On Apr 26, 2019, at 14:12 , Daniel Kochmański <daniel at turtleware.eu> wrote:
> 
> sorry, replied directly instead to the group. forwarding to the ml.
> 
> On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 14:04 +0200, Daniel Kochmański wrote:
>>> This has been discussed before and it was not quite deemed a very
>>> useful approach, as it would mean that you would have single
>>> namespace where different implementations of a given CDR would be
>>> dumped, possibly causing unwanted misalignments.
>> 
>> If something may be implemented as a library (i.e doesn't require
>> special interfaces provided by the implementation) it might be
>> arguable
>> if it is a useful as a "standard extension" instead of a "library
>> with
>> documented protocol".
> 

True, but I don’t think CDR should forbid the submission of what could be “a library”.

Cheers

--
Marco Antoniotti