Pre-submission discussion: code walking

Daniel Kochmański daniel at turtleware.eu
Fri Apr 26 12:12:07 UTC 2019


sorry, replied directly instead to the group. forwarding to the ml.

On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 14:04 +0200, Daniel Kochmański wrote:
> > This has been discussed before and it was not quite deemed a very
> > useful approach, as it would mean that you would have single
> > namespace where different implementations of a given CDR would be
> > dumped, possibly causing unwanted misalignments.
> 
> If something may be implemented as a library (i.e doesn't require
> special interfaces provided by the implementation) it might be
> arguable
> if it is a useful as a "standard extension" instead of a "library
> with
> documented protocol".




More information about the cdr-discuss mailing list