Pre-submission discussion: code walking

[Daniel Kochmański]

> 
> My plan for walkability is: compliance with CDR-NN requires having
> a package with name CDR-NN that has all the symbols defined in CDR-
> NN.
> 

IMHO if CDR's are truly meant as a process to augument standarization
then all that should be in a single package (with an additional "CDR-
USER" package which uses CL and CDR and is not locked). That will
ensure that there are no symbol conflicts and it is indeed a possible
candidate for inclusion a "base" package. Also too many packages is a
tedious disease of many systems.