[cdr-discuss] Re: [RfC] WITH-READTABLE-ITERATOR
Tobias C. Rittweiler
tcr at freebits.de
Fri Oct 3 17:05:39 UTC 2008
Thanks for the corrections!
Ariel Badichi writes:
> > MACRO-CHAR-TYPES. If MACRO-CHAR-TYPES is null, both `:macro-char' and
> I take it you meant "nil" (or better yet, "the empty list") rather than
I used "If M-C-T are not supplied, ...".
> > An error of type `type-error' is signalled if READTABLE does not
> The CLHS uses the alternative spelling, "signaled". Why is this passage
> in the passive, while the previous one was in the active?
No particular reason.
More information about the cdr-discuss