[cdr-discuss] Re: [RfC] WITH-READTABLE-ITERATOR

[Tobias C. Rittweiler]

Thanks for the corrections!


Ariel Badichi  writes:

> > MACRO-CHAR-TYPES.  If MACRO-CHAR-TYPES is null, both `:macro-char' and
>
> I take it you meant "nil" (or better yet, "the empty list") rather than
> "null".

I used "If M-C-T are not supplied, ...".


> > An error of type `type-error' is signalled if READTABLE does not
>
> The CLHS uses the alternative spelling, "signaled".  Why is this passage
> in the passive, while the previous one was in the active?

No particular reason.

  -T.