[cdr-discuss] Re: [RfC] WITH-READTABLE-ITERATOR
Tobias C. Rittweiler
tcr at freebits.de
Fri Oct 3 15:04:00 UTC 2008
"Tobias C. Rittweiler" writes:
> The variable MACRO-CHAR-TYPES controls which macro characters are returned:
>
> `:macro-char'
> All macro characters in READTABLE that are _not_ dispatch macro
> characters.
>
> `:dispatch-macro-char'
> All dispatch macro characters in READTABLE.
I'm not perfectly happy with these names. Especially the first one is
somewhat misleading. But I don't think I'd be happy with
:NON-DISPATCH-MACRO-CHAR either.
But what I wanted to ask is if these names should be in plural perhaps
rather than in singular?
(with-readtable-iterator (next-entry *readtable* :dispatch-macro-chars)
...)
looks better to my eyes than
(with-readtable-iterator (next-entry *readtable* :dispatch-macro-char)
...)
What do you think?
-T.
More information about the cdr-discuss
mailing list